General Motors (GM) scores earnings beat, but big revenue miss >>> READ MORE

3 Funds To Sell Now, 1 High-Yield Replacement to Buy

Here are ways to get more get aggressive in your investing model

    View All  

The Wall Street Journal reports — yet again — that stock picking is dead. We’re being told that passive index funds outperform actively managed funds over the long term, and smart investors should choose passive because actively beating the market isn’t possible.

On one level, this is true. If your plan is just to buy and hold for 30 years or more, and if you don’t need any income right now, you are probably better off with a low-cost index fund than a higher-cost actively managed fund.

But what if need income NOW? Then the “wisdom” of passive investing isn’t so great, and you need to consider alternatives.

Let’s look at two passive S&P 500 funds, the SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) and Vanguard’s alternative, the Vanguard 500 ETF (VOO). First you’ll notice the dividends on these funds are awful:

Low Yields, High Risk


A measly 2% income isn’t going to cut it for most retirees, especially when these funds can (and have) fallen by 10% or more in the span of a few months. Just ask anyone who owns low-cost (and low-return) VOO:

Start of a Downtrend?


You already lost 2.8% if you bought at the top over the past 3 months. The same goes for SPY:

Look Familiar? Index Funds Drop


Stock prices are precarious right now, to say the least. The market predicts a 70% chance of the Federal Reserve raising interest rates in December. When interest rates go up, risk-averse investors (who are increasingly becoming part of the stock market itself thanks to passive index funds) will shift towards U.S. Treasuries and away from widely owned stocks. This is especially true if they’re looking for dividends.

The iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) is already yielding more than the stock index funds—and with less risk:

Bond Yields Beat Stocks, At Last


Does this mean we should buy U.S. Treasuries? Alas, no, because they’re also at risk with a rate hike. So where can we go?

There is a great alternative to SPY and VOO that has many of the characteristics risk-averse investors should love. The fund pays a dividend of 7% and provides less exposure to stock downturns than the index funds. Also, the fund is selling at a discount of 9%, meaning you’re buying $1 of stocks for about 91 cents.

The fund is the Nuveen S&P 500 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (SPXX) and it’s unique in that it provides exposure to the S&P 500 but always sells call options on those stocks to provide a higher rate of income. This is extremely good if you need income right now and you’re (rightly) worried about a stock market correction coming in the wake of the Fed’s rate hike.

You could stagger purchases in this fund over the next few weeks and take advantage of its dividend payouts while also getting some limited exposure to the market as a whole. We are already seeing the fund being sold in a panic (further widening its discount):

Fear Driving Investors Away


We want to run against the herd and buy this fund because of the discount. But if SPXX is so great, why aren’t more people buying it? There’s one simple answer: the fear of fees. The fund’s total annual expenses are 0.92%, whereas VOO’s annual expenses are 0.05%. This is something passive investors love to focus on—look, you’re paying 18.4-times as much in fees as I am!

But what does that mean in actual hard dollar terms? A $500,000 investment in VOO will have annual fees of $250, versus $4,600 in annual fees for SPXX. That sounds like a very big difference, but remember that those fees are taken out of the fund before distributions—you don’t get a big bill that needs to be paid out of pocket. Most people don’t even notice the fees at all (which is partly why ill-managed funds get away with charging fees of 2% or more).

But will these fees drag on performance? The answer is yes and no. Over the long term, yes, it will, as we can see from this chart:

Total Returns for VOO and SPXX


But notice how there are moments of great divergence between VOO’s and SPXX’s total returns — and how that divergence is greater now than it has been in a long time.Shortly after those divergences, SPXX tends to revert to VOO’s trendline — and sometimes even outperforms VOO.

That’s why now is a terrible time to buy VOO but a great time to buy SPXX. It will revert to VOO’s trendline, meaning it will recover more sharply than VOO whenever the market begins to recover. And if you buy SPXX now and wait for that recovery, you’ll also be getting a dividend of over 7%.

The divergence between SPXX, and its inevitable recovery, hasn’t been happening just relative to VOO.

Let’s look at another low-cost Vanguard favorite…

Next Page

Article printed from InvestorPlace Media,

©2017 InvestorPlace Media, LLC