How Will Debt Squabbling Impact Treasuries?

by ETFguide | November 28, 2011 11:59 am

Dreaming up a deficit reduction commission was the easy part. Unfortunately, nobody thought getting committee members to agree would be the hard part.

How will the deficit impasse affect U.S. Treasury prices? Are higher bond yields just ahead? And what about the U.S. government’s credit rating?

Agreeing to Disagree

After two months of intense negotiations, talks among the 12-member “supercommittee” broke down last week. The committee is an even split between Democrats and Republicans and they agreed to disagree, which means $1.2 trillion in automatic spending cuts that begin in 2013 have been triggered. What’s so bad about that? Automatic spending cuts are good for the deficit, but only if Congress doesn’t try to undo them.

Meanwhile, Treasury prices continue their upward march despite all of the doom and gloom proclamations. Since the beginning of the year, long-term U.S. Treasuries are ahead by 10.32% over the past three months and more than 33%. Even during the mid-year debt ceiling debacle, ETFguide took a contrarian view and kept its bullish view of Treasuries, in contrast to many of Wall Street’s pundits, including PIMCO’s very outspoken Bill Gross. But what about now?

A Credit Rating for the Ages

I rank Warren Buffett’s declaration that the U.S. government deserves to have a quadruple-A rating as the most foolish financial utterance made this year — and that’s saying something, because the year isn’t yet over. Credit ratings have been wrong in the past, they’re still wrong today and they’ll be wrong again in the future. Buffett probably knows this, but as a shareholder in Moody’s (NYSE:MCO[1]), he’s got financial interests to protect. Parents protect their ill-mannered children all the time, so in this regard Buffett is no different.

The general translation is this: Taking long or short positions in Treasuries — or anything else, for that matter — based upon the credit opinions of the three musketeers (Fitch Ratings, Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s) is a dumb strategy. This especially is true in the world of “high finance” where many institutional investors and pension funds still accept credit ratings as gospel.

The fact is credit raters are unreliable, at times incompetent and at other times utterly shameful. The mistaken downgrade of France’s AAA credit rating by Standard & Poor’s is a perfect example of all three. Investigators still are searching for an answer to how such a magnificent blunder of this sort could occur. For lack of a better explanation, I’m just calling it a “wardrobe malfunction.”

Cheering for Higher Taxes

What will it take to reduce the deficit and what will it mean for Treasuries? The pitiful truth is that spending cuts alone will not be enough to significantly reduce the nation’s $14 trillion debt load. Put another way, higher taxes are a certainty.

Yet, the reality of higher future taxes is something few Congressional members will admit. It’s easier to kick the can down the road and let another President or another administration deal with it, rather than to face the truth.

Alan Simpson, a Republican who served as co-chairman of President Barack Obama’s deficit committee last year along with fellow deficit committee co-chairman Erskine Bowles have gone on a national tour explaining to crowds or ordinary Americans that solving the nation’s debt problem requires a combination of spending cuts and tax hikes. How have crowds responded? According to Simpson, he’s received standing ovations regardless of the people’s political leanings. It remains to be seen whether the standing ovations will continue — when and if higher taxes become a reality.

In the end, taxation is based purely upon supply and demand. The people supply whenever the government demands.

Conclusion

Today, the future movement of U.S. Treasuries already is being shaped. And again, the crowd and its conventional wisdom will be proven wrong. Why are traditional credit models, including analysis of bonds still broken? Because the fancy quant models can’t quantify Washington, D.C.’s folly.

Ron DeLegge is the Editor of ETFguide.com and Author of ‘Gents with No Cents: A Closer Look at Wall Street, its Customers, Financial Regulators, and the Media’ (Half Full Publishing, 2011). 

This article is brought to you by ETFguide.com. ETFguide is the information leader on exchange-traded funds because of its vendor-neutral approach and its progressive reporting style. Unique features include an ETF bookstore, a monthly email newsletter and subscription-based ETF portfolios.

Endnotes:
  1. MCO: http://studio-5.financialcontent.com/investplace/quote?Symbol=MCO

Source URL: http://investorplace.com/investorpolitics/deficit-supercommittee-treasuries-mco-warren-buffett/
Short URL: http://invstplc.com/1fBhU3y