Election 2012: Woodstock and the Swiss

Seemingly odd influences could create a stronger America

   

Woodstock 1969 300x201 Election 2012: Woodstock and the SwissWere you at Woodstock? It was a seminal event — some 500,000 strong. Although a little muddy and a little dopey, the energy delivered from the masses was like no other. People from all over the country showed up to peacefully protest Lyndon Johnson’s Vietnam War while they enjoyed great music from the likes of Joe Cocker, among many others. Inevitably, Woodstock turned out to be unprecedented in scope and influence; a coming together of people from all walks of life with a single common goal.

I am convinced that the 2012 elections will require the same kind of mega-energy from the Tea Party in order to wipe Team Obama from the American landscape. The Tea Party ideally would have a candidate who can project its views — such as a Patrick Henry, Harry Browne, Nigel Farage or Chris Christie. But if it doesn’t, the Tea Party is going to have to suck it up and get behind the candidate who gets the nod. It’s that simple. Defeating the Obama crowd is the job at hand, and victory must be assured.

The Tea Party can balance the books by seeing to it that it locks down every House seat possible and promotes hardliners for the Senate. Controlling the House and Senate, while cleansing the House leadership of Mr. Boehner, would go a long way in forcing a new president to adopt policies constructive to the formation of a constitutionally strong federal republic.

America has largely been on the wrong track since the days of Woodrow Wilson. He gave us WWI and the Fed, among other travesties. After Wilson came the disasters of FDR, Truman, Johnson, Carter, Bush and now Obama — each delivering a long list of catastrophic intrusions into the lives of Americans. It all has to end, and 2012 needs to be the finish line.

I have written in the past of the Swiss Confederation and its weak central government form (the presidency is a ceremonial office and rotates). This year, it is led by Micheline Calmy-Rey. Calmy-Rey has no powers above the other seven members of the Swiss Federal Council. The entire Federal Council is considered a collective head of state.

Switzerland is a neutral country with the lowest crime rate in the world and a powerful national defense system. Instead of a standing army, Switzerland requires every man to undergo military training for a few days or weeks per year throughout most of his life. Each man is required to keep his assigned automatic rifle at home at the ready. The Swiss are powerful believers in individual liberty and freedom. They believe there is no need for a higher legal authority to check people’s initiatives. In fact, federal court in Switzerland is not allowed to rule on any constitutional matter at the national level. The Swiss are all about keeping things at the cantonal level. Keeping it local is the key in Switzerland.

Americans have a lot to learn from “the Swiss way.” Switzerland’s model is precisely the weak form of central government intended by our founders. Hopefully, we will begin to return to the days of small government, starting with an energetic surge from the masses — much like during Woodstock — and culminating in the election of a competent president.

This article originally appeared on Richardcyoung.com.


Article printed from InvestorPlace Media, http://investorplace.com/investorpolitics/election-2012-woodstock-1969-swiss-tea-party/.

©2014 InvestorPlace Media, LLC

Comments are currently unavailable. Please check back soon.