- About InvestorPolitics
There’s no doubt that money and politics are very intertwined these days. InvestorPolitics was created to filter through the conventional media noise, serve up some of the most important policy issues of the day and explain how they could impact your personal finances and your retirement.
InvestorPolitics is an open forum for your opinions on the big political issues that affect investors and the broader economy. You will hopefully find a wide array of commentary — some you agree with and some you disagree with — as we aim to represent all points of view.
Most importantly, we want to hear what YOU have to say. We welcome you to respectfully engage with our contributors in the comment section of each InvestorPolitics post. And if there are issues you feel particularly passionate about, please send your thoughts to letters@investorplace.com and we will consider publishing your submission as an article. Letters must be less than 500 words and include your name and state of residence.
The opinions expressed here are solely those of our writers and do not reflect the views of InvestorPlace Media, LLC or those of our partners.
Follow Us by Email - ADVERTISEMENT
-
Sponsored By:
- Archives
- June 2013 (12)
- May 2013 (22)
- April 2013 (29)
- March 2013 (26)
- February 2013 (24)
- January 2013 (35)
- December 2012 (24)
- November 2012 (35)
- October 2012 (43)
- September 2012 (41)
- August 2012 (57)
- July 2012 (32)
- June 2012 (36)
- May 2012 (34)
- April 2012 (32)
- March 2012 (37)
- February 2012 (45)
- January 2012 (73)
- December 2011 (18)
- November 2011 (31)
- October 2011 (18)
- September 2011 (26)
- August 2011 (13)
- July 2011 (4)
- June 2011 (14)
- May 2011 (13)
- April 2011 (19)
- March 2011 (2)
- Poll of the Day
Fly on the Wall at the Fed — What They’re Thinking
Analysis of FOMC minutes shows Fed's challenges
- We got a glimpse into the degree of support for Operation Twist: ”Two members said that current conditions and the outlook could justify stronger policy action, but they supported undertaking the maturity extension program at this meeting, as it did not rule out additional steps at future meetings. Three members [obviously Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas president Richard Fisher, FRB of Minneapolis president Narayana Kocherlakota and FRB of Philadelphia president Charles Plosser] concluded that additional accommodation was not appropriate at this time.” Presumably everybody else, both voters and nonvoters alike, was supportive of the policy.
- As for the three dissenters, Kocherlakota stuck to his August dissent rationale, which was that no easing at all was warranted, while Fisher and Plosser believed that twisting would not be effective and could have negative consequences. Fisher argued that the FOMC ”should instead focus their attention on improving the monetary policy transmission mechanism, particularly with regard to the activity of community banks, which are vital to small-business lending and job creation.” This suggests he might be the least hawkish of the three.
Bottom line
This Fed team has been the most accommodating in history, and it is still scrambling for more ways to provide monetary tools to forestall deflation and recession. Nice to see that the FOMC members are on the case, but frankly it’s doubtful that they will act soon enough, or powerfully enough, to forestall the downshifting of the business cycle and, with it, deeper unemployment and erosion of home prices.
Article printed from InvestorPlace Media, http://investorplace.com/investorpolitics/fly-on-the-wall-at-the-fed-what-theyre-thinking-federal-reserve-stimulus-quantitative-easing/.
©2013 InvestorPlace Media, LLC


















Comments are currently unavailable. Please check back soon.