by Wendy Simmons | August 31, 2012 5:00 pm
The Republican National Convention wrapped up last night, and like a certain Clint Eastwood movie, parts of it were good, parts of it were bad, and parts of it were, well…not exactly ugly, but missing altogether. Here’s a look at what was good, what was bad, and what was absent from the RNC.
The Republicans did a great job reaching out to female voters. They went into this convention facing a major image problem with women. The Democrats have framed GOP policy as a “war on women” all summer. After Todd Akin (House member and Senate candidate from Missouri) made his infamous “legitimate rape” comments last week, the GOP had a particularly steep hill to climb in assuring voters that it is not the party of misogyny.
On this front, I found the convention effective. While they obviously did not pivot from their stand on abortion, the speakers and speeches were able to deflect attention from the more extreme voices and positions in the party. Rick Santorum, perhaps the most high-profile defender of the pro-life position, did not even say the word “abortion” in his speech, though he did pledge to care for all children, both “born and unborn.”
Even more importantly, the Republicans were able to highlight some talented young female leaders in the party, including Susana Martinez, the governor of New Mexico and Nicki Haley, the governor of South Carolina. Condi Rice made a forceful case for Romney’s foreign policy.
Perhaps most unexpected and well-received, though, was the young mayor of Saratoga Springs, Utah, Mia Love, who is also running for a House seat this year. Her personal narrative of self-reliant parents who emigrated from Haiti brought the crowd to its feet.
The most appealing woman of all was Ann Romney. She is a lovely, charismatic speaker who was able to connect with women about mothering and marriage. Her speech sought to assure Americans that her husband is a trustworthy, warm, empathetic and capable leader who will work hard on behalf of the American people. Regardless of whether you like or agree with Mitt Romney, it is difficult not to appreciate his better half.
Despite the fact that the Republican nominee has been running for president for the past 5 or 6 years, Americans still generally did not have a favorable impression of Mitt Romney going into the convention. His notoriously stiff personality, lack of perceived warmth and enormous wealth — coupled with the barrage of attack ads put out by his opponents during the long primary season and also by the Obama campaign — made it difficult for most voters to see him as someone who understood their problems. This convention was in large part an effort to “humanize” Mitt Romney and highlight his family and personal history in a new way for the undecided voters who might just now be tuning into the campaign.
Only time will tell over the next few days whether or not Romney was able to improve his “likeability” scores in the polls, but it won’t be for lack of a good effort. Despite the fact that several of the speakers talked more about themselves than their nominee (Chris Christie being the guiltiest on this front), on the whole the convention presented some new material about Romney and his family that I bet worked well. The video montage of the Romney family growing up was excellent, showing a regular “dad” and a houseful of kids. (Unfortunately this was succeeded by Clint Eastwood’s unmitigated disaster; more on that later.)
A parade of character witnesses from his church spoke highly of Romney’s charity, character and compassion. The biggest mistake the campaign made was not putting these people on in prime-time, as the efficacy of their message was likely lost on the undecided voters, who were not tuned into the proceedings early in the evening.
Romney’s acceptance speech met the (admittedly low) standard that the commentariat had set for it: he seemed genuine. To me, the most interesting aspect of the speech was his focus on women. The story of his mom running for Senate and his initiative to promote women while working at Bain were both powerful anecdotes in the effort to counter the “sexist” reputation of the GOP.
Paul Ryan’s speech on Wednesday night, while well delivered, was truly one of the most inaccurate and misleading major speeches given in recent memory. From downplaying his own role in defeating Bowles-Simpson to lying about a GM plant in his district closing on Obama’s watch, the speech was so replete with deception that even Fox News called them out on it.
The problem for Romney and Ryan now is that the Democrats get their turn in the spotlight next week. Surely they will dismantle Ryan’s speech point by point and appear to be the grownups in the room.
I cannot overstate the disaster that Clint Eastwood’s “surprise” appearance on stage last night was for the convention overall. His unscripted conversation with “Invisible Obama” was bizarre, threw the rhythm of the night off and has been sucking up media coverage that should be focusing on Romney.
The only positive thing to come from the Eastwood shenanigans is comic relief: www.twitter.com/InvisibleObama.
Although Eastwood’s empty chair is the talk of the town, what was actually missing from the RNC was policy. The speeches were filled with rhetoric about the disappointment of the Obama administration and how a Romney administration could get us back on track and suddenly create “jobs, lots of jobs.”
Although conventions are typically large pep rallies for the party faithful and do not focus much on specifics, it still would have been nice to come away with at least one concrete step Romney would take to achieve his goals. He talked generally about repealing Obamacare and getting government out of the way but did not connect the dots from those ideas to the goals of job creation, freedom and family that were central to his speech.
Also notably invisible was reference to Romney’s legislative accomplishments while Governor of Massachusetts. These, presumably, are equally if not more important than his experience in the private sector in preparing him for the presidency. In his big debut on the national stage as a nominee, it was an odd omission. Of course, we knew that in the primaries he was playing to the far right wing of his party but his campaign surely could have figure out a way to package his governorship appropriately for the swing voters.
THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION
Despite Jeb Bush’s forceful defense of his brother and Condi Rice’s excellent speech, the Republicans went to great lengths to keep George W. Bush in the invisible chair throughout the convention. On that they succeeded.
The opinions contained in this column are solely those of the writer.
Want to share your own views on money, politics and the 2012 elections? Drop us a line at firstname.lastname@example.org and we might reprint your views in our InvestorPolitics blog! Please include your name, city and state of residence. All letters submitted to this address will be considered for publication.
Source URL: http://investorplace.com/investorpolitics/gop-convention-wrap-up-the-good-the-bad-and-the-absent/
Short URL: http://invstplc.com/1aLLnch
Copyright ©2014 InvestorPlace Media, LLC. All rights reserved. 700 Indian Springs Drive, Lancaster, PA 17601.