by ETFguide | August 26, 2011 5:09 pm
Hope is not an investment strategy. Yet, the stock market’s fate seems to be closely tied to Bernanke’s Jackson Hole comments and the hope of QE3.
Bernanke’s 2010 Jackson Hole comments on Friday breathed life into the markets (see chart below). But did his 2011 Jackson Hole pep talk on Friday deliver the needed hope or was it another nail in the coffin?
Below is a thorough analysis of Bernanke’s 2011 speech along with a comparison to the 2010 speech. More importantly, we will discuss what the market thinks the odds of higher prices are.
The parallels between the timing of the 2010 and 2011 speeches and the stock market’s performance are quite amazing. It explains why investors put their hope in QE3.
Amidst an avalanche of hope and optimism, the S&P, Dow Jones and Nasdaq peaked on April 26 at S&P 1,220. From April to July the S&P tumbled 17% and delivered a never before seen ‘Flash Crash.’ It was Bernanke’s August 27, 2010 speech that marked a turnaround for stocks.
In 2011, the major indexes peaked on May 2 at 1,371 (the red and yellow line in the chart below show the resistance levels).
Thus far, the S&P lost as much as 19%. Will Bernanke’s speech mark another turnaround?
Friday’s Bernanke speech filled eleven pages. He spent about four pages talking about how bad the economy is, four pages on why the Great America will come back and three pages on suggestions for lawmakers.
In other words, 80% of Bernanke’s speech could be summed up like this: ‘We have learned that the recession was even deeper and the recovery even weaker than we had thought. With respect to the longer-run prospects, however, my own view is more optimistic.’
The only statement pertaining to a potential QE3 was this one: ‘In addition to refining our forward guidance, the Federal Reserve has a range of tools that could be used to provide additional monetary stimulus. We discussed the relative merits and costs of such tools at our August meeting. We will continue to consider those and other pertinent issues, including of course economic and financial developments, at our meeting in September, which has been scheduled for two days (the 20th and the 21st) instead of one to allow a fuller discussion. The Committee will continue to assess the economic outlook in light of incoming information and is prepared to employ its tools as appropriate to promote a stronger economic recovery in a context of price stability.’
As comparison, here are the words that sent stocks soaring in 2010: ‘The FOMC is prepared to provide additional accommodation if needed to support the economic recovery and to return inflation, over time, to levels consistent with its mandate. Regardless of the risks of deflation, the FOMC will do all that it can to ensure continuation of the economic recovery. A first option for providing additional monetary accommodation, if necessary, is to expand the Federal Reserve’s holdings of longer-term securities. I believe that additional purchases of longer-term securities, should the FOMC choose to undertake them, would be effective in further easing financial conditions.’
No doubt QE2 was a huge driving force behind stocks –while it lasted. But today stocks trade lower than they did at the onset of QE2. If QE2 couldn’t provide lasting benefits, why should QE3? Does any form or shape of QE provide a lasting benefit?
The stock market without QE2 liquidity is like a junkie without the next fix. Today’s revision of the GDP shows just how bad of shape the economy is in despite the help of QE2. GDP was revised downward for the second time. The economy advanced just 0.4% in the first quarter of 2011. Keep in mind that the stock market was up as much as 5% in Q1.
QE provides liquidity, but that’s it. What happens when that liquidity dries up? The chart below plots the S&P against two sources of cash flow (available margin and mutual fund cash levels) independent of QE2.
In short, there was no cash on the sidelines. The red arrows show what happened the last time available cash levels were as low as in May – the market crashed.
The numbers allowed for only one logical conclusion. Without the generous monetary policy (QE2 ended June 30) there was very little new cash left to drive stock prices higher.
Technicals supported this outlook. If you look at the top of the above chart again you see a giant M or head and shoulders pattern. The projected upside target for the right shoulder was met in April and the risk of a sell off was high.
The end of QE2 met up with poor seasonality, a major head and shoulders top, a Dow Theory bearish non-confirmation and the break of a multi-year support line for a perfect storm.
Is the storm over? Nobody knows if and in what shape QE3 will appear. We’ve been conditioned to respect any form of QE and it would be foolish to ignore its potential effect. However, the market tends to do the unexpected.
While we don’t know the outcome, we know the expectation is that stocks will rally on news of QE3. The unexpected would be the opposite — falling stocks and a rising VIX.
This article is brought to you by ETFguide.com. ETFguide is the information leader on exchange-traded funds because of its vendor-neutral approach and its progressive reporting style. Unique features include an ETF bookstore, a monthly e-mail newsletter, and subscription based ETF portfolios.
Source URL: http://investorplace.com/investorpolitics/tale-of-two-bernanke-speeches/
Short URL: http://investorplace.com/?p=59842
Copyright ©2016 InvestorPlace Media, LLC. All rights reserved. 700 Indian Springs Drive, Lancaster, PA 17601.