Among the major integrated energy firms, Exxon Mobil Corporation (NYSE:XOM) and Chevron Corporation (NYSE:CVX) deserve a special mention, since they have such massive market caps of $351.4 billion and $222.6 billion, respectively. Thus, these companies dominate and define the Zacks Oil International industry.
These energy majors have a strong earnings surprise history, as they have managed to surpass the Zacks Consensus Estimate for earnings in three of the last four quarters. And, Exxon and Cevron have an average positive earnings surprise of 8.8% and 1.8%, respectively.
During the third quarter of 2017, Exxon Mobil’s revenues of $66.165 billion beat the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $63.508 billion. Moreover, earnings of 93 cents surpassed the Zacks Consensus Estimate of 89 cents.
Chevron’s third-quarter performance has also been impressive. Revenues of $36.205 billion steered past the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $33.667 billion. On top of that, earnings of $1.03 per share surpassed the consensus mark of 99 cents.
Although both the stocks are attractive picks for investors based on their earnings reports, our research shows Exxon Mobil is a better choice than Chevron.
We have employed three parameters for an in-depth comparative analysis.
Strong Potential to Generate Cash Flow
Investors look for indicators that gauge the ability of a company to generate free cash flow from investments. For this purpose, we have employed the free cash flow yield ratio. Companies with strong operations generally have high free cash flow yield, indicating that the amount of money investors are generating is more than the amount spent to buy the stock.
Our proprietary model shows that free cash flow yield for Exxon Mobil stands at 4.4%, way higher than 1.9% for Chevron.
Sufficient Funds to Meet Capital Expenditure
We calculate a company’s free cash flow after deducting capital spending from operating cash flow. Over the last four quarters, free cash flow for Exxon Mobil came in at $15.263 billion, indicating that the firm has sufficient cash flow to fund capital spending. In other words, Exxon Mobil generated $30.051 billion in net cash from core operations, while its capital spending amounted $14.788 billion.
Chevron’s free cash flow of $4.376 billion is considerably lower than that of Exxon Mobil. This signifies that the possibility of Chevron to rely on debt for financing future operations is significantly higher than Exxon Mobil.
Healthy Balance Sheet
From a comparative study of the debt-to-capitalization ratio, it is clear that Exxon Mobil has significantly less reliance on debt than Chevron. The debt-to-capitalization ratio of Exxon Mobil presently stands at 11.6% against 23% for Chevron.
Exxon Mobil also has lower long-term debt despite it being 1.6 times bigger taking into consideration its market capitalization. The company’s long-term debt load, as of Sept 30, stands at $24.869 billion, much lower than $34.075 billion for Chevron. Also, Exxon Mobil’s long-term debt is substantially lower than $56.893 billion for BP plc (NYSE:BP) and $79.681 billion for Royal Dutch Shell plc (NYSE:RDS.A).
Conclusion for Exxon Mobil Stock
Our comparative analysis shows that return from investment in Exxon Mobil is way higher than Chevron. This is also reflected in Exxon Mobil’s current Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy), which implies that the stock will significantly outperform the broader U.S. equity market over the next one to three months. You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank stocks here.
Meanwhile, Chevron carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold), signifying that the stock will perform in line with the broader U.S. equity market over the next one to three months.
The Hottest Tech Mega-Trend of All
Last year, it generated $8 billion in global revenues. By 2020, it’s predicted to blast through the roof to $47 billion. Famed investor Mark Cuban says it will produce “”the world’s first trillionaires,”” but that should still leave plenty of money for regular investors who make the right trades early.