Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Expertise: Technology, Biotech, Renewable energy

Education: M.S,J. Northwestern (Medill School) 1978; B.A. Rice University, History and Political Science 1977

Awards & Accomplishments: Tech reporter since 1982, Freelance since 1983, on Internet since 1985. Created first online coverage of Internet with a magazine, Interactive Age, 1994 Co-wrote BBS Systems for Business in 1991, Wrote Guide to Field Computing in 1992 Wrote technology history now called "Living with Moore's Law" in 2001, 2010, 2021 Author of over a dozen books, both fiction and non-fiction

About Dana:
Dana Blankenhorn has been a financial journalist since 1978, a technology journalist since 1982, and an Internet journalist since 1985. He writes a Substack newsletter, Facing the Future, which covers technology, markets, and politics.

He has written a half-dozen technology books, several novels available at the Amazon Kindle store, and covered beats ranging from education to e-commerce, and from open source to renewable energy. He lives in Atlanta.

Recent Articles

Chipotle Mexican Grill: All is Forgiven

New CEO Brian Niccol, who had previously turned around Taco Bell, has added salad-based lifestyle bowls and now plans to put ovens in his stores to make quesadillas and desserts

Facebook Stock’s Success Before the Big Shakedown

Facebook now faces the kind of detailed, bureaucratic scrutiny that previously destroyed the tech monopolists of IBM and Microsoft.

Is Boeing Stock’s 737-MAX Scandal a Nothingburger?

Bulls are focused on Boeing's huge backlog of orders and strength as a defense contractor, ignoring the impact of its 737-MAX scandal.

Alibaba Stock: Play Offense With Defense

Alibaba's cloud is set up to be more profitable than any in America, selling its e-commerce software directly as a service to merchants and producers around the world.

Recent Earnings Aside, Micron Stock Still Is Bound to a Cycle

Semiconductor market forecasts are reliably unreliable, and speculation that memory will come back quickly may not prove accurate.