Everybody is hoping for a swell earnings season on the assumption that it will help the markets move higher.
However, if history is any guide, weaker earnings might be just what the doctor ordered.
Obviously we don’t want a disastrous set of numbers, but downbeat earnings and guidance actually creates the possibility of more positive surprises that will encourage money to move into the markets instead of away from them.
Think of it this way: When things shift from good to bad, there’s a distinct aversion to risk and assets flee like they did following the “dot-bomb” blowup in early 2000 and at the onset of the financial crisis in 2007.
But when they go from bad to less bad, it’s human nature to assume things are improving. And that sentiment brings out the bargain hunter in all of us while also drawing money into the markets. That was the case in mid-2002 and just after March 2009, when people were hoping for something — anything, really — to get the juices flowing again.
Winning the Expectations Game
Wall Street understands this psychology better than you might imagine. That’s why manipulating earnings and analyst expectations is a science in and of itself.
Everybody denies it happens, but ask nearly any seasoned Wall Streeter and you’ll get a sideways glance and a knowing smile.
The wall that supposedly separates the research, investment banking, brokerage and trading functions of any given firm is a plumber’s worse nightmare — depending on your perspective.
Former analyst Stephen McClellan notes in his book Full of Bull that this is how the game is played. He says that’s why it’s important to do what Wall Street does rather than what it says as a means of securing your personal profits.
I couldn’t agree more. Having spent more than 20 years closely involved with the markets, I’ve learned that Wall Street’s blinders, miscues, setups and secrets are often more telling than the “telling” itself.
Consider what’s happening right now.
According to Standard & Poor’s, analysts have raised projections for 366 companies while lowering those associated with another 534 companies. In other words, lowered expectations outnumber rising expectations almost 2 to 1. Bespoke Investment Group notes that all 10 S&P sectors have had more negative revisions than positive.
That’s in stark contrast to two years ago when analysts were positive at the onset of 2010 for roughly 80% of the market with the exception of health care and utilities. Both were viewed as little more than bastard children and cast as negative performers.
As you might expect, many investors bailed out of the latter while rushing into the former. But that turned out to be a mistake — health care and utilities were the best-performing sectors in 2011.
This doesn’t always happen, but it’s well documented that Wall Street often says one thing and does another. You’d think at this stage of the game things would be different, but they’re not.
Take the Facebook IPO, which is widely believed to be imminent …
Last year, the firm made headlines with a quasi-private version of the offering with sales to private clients that imply a preposterous value of between $50 billion and $100 billion. And, right there in black and white, in the fine print it says that Goldman Sachs (NYSE:GS) may trade directly against its clients without warning and without recourse to the very investors they supposedly represent.
The lines are very clear here. Professionals know that supposedly independent research is often misleading at best and completely contradictory at worst. Notes McClellan, “transaction-oriented Wall Street, unfortunately, tends to discourage and even hinder proper investing.”