Dow Jones soars above 23,000. Is it too stretched? >>> READ MORE

The Hopeless Reductiveness of the BRICs

They have little in common other than their huge long-term potential

    View All  

A good rule of thumb is that whenever you use a properly spelled word that a spell-check program doesn’t recognize, you should probably go back and rewrite the sentence containing it.

This time, however, I decided to make an exception because the word “reductiveness” perfectly fits the economic state of affairs in the world’s largest emerging markets, famously dubbed BRICs. The editor who had pitched the story asked me if the BRIC term was “dangerously reductive” because I had something to say on the matter in June. My answer: “still hopelessly so.”

BP Makes Another Bargain-Basement Sell-Off
BP Makes Another Bargain-Basement Sell-Off

The BRIC economies are somewhat interconnected as the world economy gets more closely integrated after decades of globalization, but major differences remain among them.

Russia, with an estimated 2012 GDP per capita of $14,246, is a commodity-driven market, while China is an export powerhouse with a GDP per capita of $5,899. India is a domestic-demand story unlike the other BRICs, where exports of manufactured goods or commodities contribute a significantly smaller relative part of GDP. Finally, Brazil is more balanced than Russia with respect to its otherwise large soft and hard commodity exports. Also, Brazil is much more developed than India with estimated 2012 GDP per capita of $12,465, while India is at $1,455.

Let’s take a look at these four as the individual markets they really are.


While Russian equities have enjoyed a nice rebound since their June lows, their direction is still likely to be decided by oil prices, which have weakened somewhat in the past two weeks. The U.S. Energy Department reported that American crude production rose 11,000 barrels a day to 6.52 million last week — the most since December 1996 — while total fuel demand fell 0.3% to 18.3 million barrels a day in the four weeks ended Sept. 28. Falling demand and rising output generally is a recipe for lower prices.

Even though Russia is geared toward European and emerging market demand — where the Brent crude benchmark trades with a near $20 premium per barrel over the U.S. West Texas Intermediate benchmark — oil is fungible, and Brent and WTI affect each other. Since Chinese data have been weakening marginally all year and European economic data has been showing a more decisive similar trend, more oil price weakness is likely in a seasonally slow fourth quarter.

Russian large and small caps, investible via ETFs like Market Vectors Russia ETF (NYSE:RSX) and Market Vectors Russia Small-Cap ETF (NYSE:RSXJ), remain the cheapest in the BRIC universe, with P/Es of 6.5 and 5.4, respectively, and both trading at notable discounts to book value. Unless the oft-cited but slow-coming rebalancing of the Russian economy shifts it more toward services, I believe those depressed relative valuations to the rest of the BRICs will remain in place.


Some say the magnitude of the Chinese slowdown is better gauged via electricity or commodity demand because the data there are more reliable. On the commodities front, there was news that Australia — a major Chinese trading partner — had its worst trade numbers in more than four years in August. Australia’s trade deficit came in at A$2 billion, almost three times larger than consensus estimates, as weakening Asian demand for resources was a major factor.

Australia’s exports fell 3.3% in August to A$24.6 billion for a third consecutive month as iron ore exports fell by A$500 million and coal exports fell by A$400 million. Australian exports are 12% lower than last year, which is their worst annual decline since early 2010.

The iron ore issue will be big for Australia because Chinese demand is weakening as supply is increasing. Since 2004, China has spent an average 8% of GDP on steel, or 16 times higher than the average U.S. rate.

It’s typical for industrializing economies to have natural resource-intensive growth, yet an industrializing economy of such massive size relative to world GDP like China hasn’t shown a significant slowdown in a long time. The magnitude of the price decline in iron ore is yet unknowable. In this environment, one should be careful with more cyclical China-geared companies like iron ore and coal producers, both on and off the Mainland.

Article printed from InvestorPlace Media,

©2017 InvestorPlace Media, LLC