It's a good idea to be selective in the stock market, no matter what the conditions may be. Selectivity begins by looking for opportunities where the crowd is not.

A group of stocks is uniquely positioned to profit from falling rates – and a window is opening that could lead to potential returns of 100% or more over the next 12-24 months.

When AI arrived on the scene, it immediately cleared a seat at the table for nuclear power, alongside renewables like solar and wind. The data centers that power AI technologies require such prodigious – and reliable – volumes of electricity, that tech giants like Amazon and Microsoft “rediscovered” nuclear power as an ideal energy source.

Let’s discuss why it’s so important to be mindful of valuations. Then, I’ll share why you’ll want to invest in companies beyond the pricy AI bets… and where to find them.

Thanks to AI, we will soon ride in robotaxis, have personalized treatment plans for major diseases, and much more... totally transforming the way we work, live, and play. However, some things will change for the worse…

Some companies can be great investments while they are in the process of building their moats, but they are vulnerable to competitive assaults. Therefore, if you want to be more selective about your new investments, pay attention to the moats those companies possess… or don’t.

In my 40-plus years in the market, I’ve seen my fair share of manias. And what I can tell you that most folks don’t realize is this: These manias don’t just happen overnight. They quietly build in the background, over a period of many years.

AI and automation in healthcare is a megatrend I’ve been keeping a close eye on for a while now. And the chances of profiting from it are multiplying rapidly.

Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, and others have invested billions in AI technologies. So far, they’ve mainly followed the established practice laid out by OpenAI... But there’s one company with foresight, patience, and commitment to innovation that could do for AI that Apple did for computing...

Indeed, AI is both a creative and destructive force. And among the things that AI will destroy are millions of jobs. We saw one of the effects of this threat just last week when the International Longshoremen’s Association (INA) went on strike, asking for higher wages… and citing the risk of AI automation.

Card playing is complex. The best professional poker players aren’t just playing the mathematical odds… they’re watching what everyone else is doing and using those observations to adjust their views. The same is true for global macroeconomic investing.

Silicon Valley can only tell us that self-driving cars are “five years away from being five years away” for so long before we doubt their story. Still, Luke Lango has been bullish on autonomous vehicles for a while now.

While we’ve been hearing about autonomous vehicles and AI wiping out jobs for years, we’ve not yet seen much on-the-ground evidence of it. However, my colleague Luke Lango definitely knows something.

Automakers have long known that cars are parked roughly 95% of the time. Most vehicles are needed on demand, and we simply leave them in driveways and parking lots because they can’t move themselves. But what if they could?

Neither J.D. Vance nor Tim Walz mentioned it at the vice-presidential debate… nor did Kamala Harris or Donald Trump talk about it during their September 10 presidential debate. Meanwhile, it’s all anyone seems to be talking about out here in the real world…

As AI expands its reach, we investors must continuously examine both the opportunities and the hazards it will create for various industries. Today, let’s take a look at one company that seems particularly vulnerable to AI’s expanding presence in the global economy…

My InvestorPlace colleague Louis Navellier recently came out with an upgrade to his propriety stock picking system. It’s called Stock Grader.

AI has entered into a limitless, ever-expanding universe of possibilities. And these possibilities include both creative and destructive powers.

The situation at the chip designer and fab I want to talk about today is not as bad as it seems. In fact, its situation is eerily similar to that of AMD in 2007-’08... and that could spell good news for the company. Here’s the story...