When Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN) announced in 2017 that it would pay $13.7 billion to buy Whole Foods, my reaction was that, for another $10 billion, AMZN could have bought all the shares of Kroger (NYSE:KR) stock.
The market cap of KR stock this morning was $22.73 billion, barely one-sixth its fiscal 2018 sales. The market cap of Walmart stock, on the other hand, is equal to more than half of the company’s sales.
Since AMZN bought Whole Foods, Kroger has been fighting Whole Foods (and by extension Amazon) with every fiber of its being, using a project KR calls “Restock Kroger.”
Recently, as part of that initiative, KR made a deal with Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) to incorporate technology into two of its stores and make them more like AMZN’s Amazon Go outlets. According to The Verge, the stores developed by Kroger and MSFT “are filled with digital shelf labels and image recognition cameras, and aim to create a retail environment that’s easier for both customers and retail employees to navigate.”
But the whole story of KR stock is a little more complicated.
Retail Is Complex
A grocery store isn’t just where food is sold. It’s also a place to which food is supplied.
The key to winning isn’t just getting people to come in and buy the merchandise. Supplying stores at the lowest possible prices and keeping inventory losses to a minimum are also key parts of the business.
Kroger has made a number of deals to boost its performance in those areas. It has become the U.S. licensee for Ocado, a British company that aims to make profitable online sales through automated warehouses. It also bought Home Chef, a meal-kit company.
Warehouses like those designed by Ocado can break bulk efficiently and centrally. Meal kits like those of Home Chef reduce waste by sending people only what they need to cook a meal. Not all the competition in this space is taking place on the sales floor.
The Macy’s Problem
The real problem for Kroger and owners of KR stock remains that no one knows what Kroger is.
As I have written many times, Kroger is Mariano’s in Chicago. It’s Harris Teeter in North Carolina, and Ralph’s in California. It’s King Soopers in Colorado and Fred Meyer in Oregon.
All these retail chains operate independently, as we learned when Kroger closed its Kroger-branded operations in North Carolina, whose workers were unionized, and replaced them with Harris Teeter stores, whose employees are not in unions.
As a result, even some owners of KR stock may not know just how big Kroger is. It had sales of $122 billion in its last fiscal year and should come close to surpassing that total when it reports its Q4 results in March. Kroger easily covers the 14-cent quarterly dividend paid by KR stock. which currently has a dividend yield of almost 2%
KR has the same problem that Federated Department Stores faced in the last century. Federated finally chose Macy’s (NYSE:M) as its brand, and as recently as 2015, Macy’s was doing well, until the performance of shopping malls tumbled.
Kroger might do well to remember this history and consolidate itself under one brand name, rather than doing side deals like selling its convenience stores, which it did last year for $2.15 billion.
The Bottom Line on KR Stock
If Kroger had a single identity, its deals with MSFT, Ocado and Home Chef would have had much more of an impact on KR stock.
But that’s one big change that looks unlikely to happen, which is why KR stock is selling for 31% less than it did in late 2015, against a 26% gain by the S&P 500. KR stock has held up well in the current volatile market, and it’s risen over the last six months.
But KR stock is still a defensive play, appealing primarily to risk-off investors.
That is sad because KR stock could be so much more.
Dana Blankenhorn is a financial and technology journalist. He is the author of a new mystery thriller, The Reluctant Detective Finds Her Family, available now at the Amazon Kindle store. Write him at firstname.lastname@example.org or follow him on Twitter at @danablankenhorn. As of this writing he owned shares in MSFT and AMZN.